ABSTRACT
This study investigated that whether a 2 mT, 60 Hz, sinusoidal electromagnetic field (EMF) alters the structure and function of cells. This research compared the effects of EMF on four kinds of cell lines: hFOB 1.19 (fetal osteoblast), T/G HA-VSMC (aortic vascular smooth muscle cell), RPMI 7666 (B lymphoblast), and HCN-2 (cortical neuronal cell). Over 14 days, cells were exposed to EMF for 1, 3, or 6 hours per day (hrs/d). The results pointed to a cell type-specific reaction to EMF exposure. In addition, the cellular responses were dependent on duration of EMF exposure. In the present study, cell proliferation was the trait most sensitive to EMF. EMF treatment promoted growth of hFOB 1.19 and HCN-2 compared with control cells at 7 and 14 days of incubation. When the exposure time was 3 hrs/d, EMF enhanced the proliferation of RPMI 7666 but inhibited that of T/G HA- VSMC. On the other hand, the effects of EMF on cell cycle distribution, cell differentiation, and actin distribution were unclear. Furthermore, we hardly found any correlation between EMF exposure and gap junctional intercellular communication in hFOB 1.19. This study revealed that EMF might serve as a potential tool for manipulating cell proliferation.
Subject(s)
Humans , Signal Transduction , Actin Cytoskeleton/radiation effects , Gap Junctions/metabolism , Electromagnetic Fields , Cell Proliferation/radiation effects , Cell Physiological Phenomena/radiation effects , Cell Line , Cell Differentiation/radiation effects , Cell Cycle/radiation effectsABSTRACT
This study investigated that whether a 2 mT, 60 Hz, sinusoidal electromagnetic field (EMF) alters the structure and function of cells. This research compared the effects of EMF on four kinds of cell lines: hFOB 1.19 (fetal osteoblast), T/G HA-VSMC (aortic vascular smooth muscle cell), RPMI 7666 (B lymphoblast), and HCN-2 (cortical neuronal cell). Over 14 days, cells were exposed to EMF for 1, 3, or 6 hours per day (hrs/d). The results pointed to a cell type-specific reaction to EMF exposure. In addition, the cellular responses were dependent on duration of EMF exposure. In the present study, cell proliferation was the trait most sensitive to EMF. EMF treatment promoted growth of hFOB 1.19 and HCN-2 compared with control cells at 7 and 14 days of incubation. When the exposure time was 3 hrs/d, EMF enhanced the proliferation of RPMI 7666 but inhibited that of T/G HA- VSMC. On the other hand, the effects of EMF on cell cycle distribution, cell differentiation, and actin distribution were unclear. Furthermore, we hardly found any correlation between EMF exposure and gap junctional intercellular communication in hFOB 1.19. This study revealed that EMF might serve as a potential tool for manipulating cell proliferation.
Subject(s)
Humans , Signal Transduction , Actin Cytoskeleton/radiation effects , Gap Junctions/metabolism , Electromagnetic Fields , Cell Proliferation/radiation effects , Cell Physiological Phenomena/radiation effects , Cell Line , Cell Differentiation/radiation effects , Cell Cycle/radiation effectsABSTRACT
Neste trabalho, apresentamos resultados experimentais que comprovam a importância do grau de coerência da luz laser no processo de cicatrizaçäo estimulado por lasers. A comprovaçäo experimental foi obtida através de estudo comparativo da açäo bioestimuladora da luz laser, e da luz laser modificada para apresentar baixo grau de coerência. Os experimentos foram desenvolvidos em feridas padronizadas e obtidas através da aplicaçäo de um "dedo frio" a nitrogênio líquido, no dorso de ratos. Os resultados säo animadores para a possível aplicaçäo clínica. Sob o ponto de vista técnico, apresentamos, nesta tese, um modelo baseado no significado físico da coerência óptica, que está relacionada com a ordenaçäo das ondas eletromagnéticas do feixe de luz laser. O conhecimento básico da física do laser e da sua interaçäo com o tecido biológico foi revisto e descrito de forma acessível aos profissionais interessados, esperando que possa servir como referência em futuros trabalhos na área